A robbery at the Louvre is easy enough to understand. Surely there isn’t a person alive who wouldn’t fancy hanging a Gericault or Leonardo in the guest bathroom. The same goes for the Musée d’Orsay and even the Centre Pompidou — French treasure houses crammed with extraordinary art practically begging for a daring heist. But the Renoir Museum? It is hard to imagine why anyone would bother, writes The Guardian.
As French art lovers recover from the news that two paintings by Pierre-Auguste Renoir were stolen from the museum in Cagnes-sur-Mer that bears his name, the rest of the art world is scratching its head: seriously? Renoir? But he’s… terrible. It’s like staging a bell-bottom heist in the age of skinny jeans.
Did the thieves know something we don’t? Or was this simply an opportunistic theft, exploiting weak security at a provincial museum?
Pierre-Auguste Renoir was one of the pillars of Impressionism, a key figure in one of the most important art movements of the 19th century. But time has been remarkably unkind to poor Pierre. While his contemporaries — Monet, Cézanne and Degas — have been hailed as modernist revolutionaries, the artists who shaped the future of Western painting, Renoir has faced fierce criticism, ridicule and protests in recent years.
In 2015, a group of activists calling themselves Renoir Sucks at Painting picketed the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston before taking their campaign to New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, carrying signs reading “God Hates Renoir” and “Re-NO-ir” and demanding that his paintings be removed from display.
They found plenty of support. The hashtag suddenly began trending, activists sold anti-Renoir T-shirts, and their social media feeds filled with photographs of people giving the finger to his paintings or pretending to vomit in front of them.
Kitsch and excessive sweetness. His paintings are rendered in a soft focus, his figures are plump and cheerful, and everything is enveloped in a haze of carefree happiness and evening revelry.
He lacks the uncompromising devotion to the angular, prismatic experimentation that made the Impressionists famous. He is the safest, most chocolate-box, most simplistic and… most sexually obsessed of the lot. That, apparently, is what made people hate him.
And this is hardly a recent phenomenon. Even his contemporaries had little love for the master. Édouard Manet reportedly said he had “no talent whatsoever,” while Mary Cassatt described his paintings of women as “the most terrible things in the world.”
Add a hefty dose of antisemitism — Renoir refused to take part in exhibitions where the Jewish Impressionist Camille Pissarro was also showing — and a generous helping of misogyny, and you have the recipe for centuries of aesthetic disdain.
From a publicity standpoint, however, the timing of the robbery is perfect. Next month, the National Gallery will open a major exhibition, Renoir and Love, hoping to replicate the blockbuster success of the artist’s show at Paris’s Musée d’Orsay last summer.
Frankly, I feel compelled to defend Renoir for the sake of an argument, but I have personally hated his work for decades. I only like him when he gets weird — when his nudes resemble a wildly psychedelic, hypersexual version of Rubens, with endless surreal waves of pinkish flesh.
I also have a soft spot for his misty, strange landscapes, although I value the work of virtually every other Impressionist more. But overall, the haters have a point.
Take a look at the paintings the burglars made off with after cutting through a wire fence with bolt cutters early in the morning.
One art detective observed that the thieves “will have absolutely no idea what to do with these paintings.” Well, they surely have a plan — and it probably involves a rubbish bin.
The funniest thing about this French Riviera heist is that the criminals initially grabbed four paintings but abandoned two of them while making their getaway.
Among those left behind was a portrait of a little boy who bears an uncanny resemblance to Boris Johnson.
In all my years as an art critic, I have never encountered such precise, devastating and brutally direct criticism as the gang’s decision to look at a painting they had already stolen and apparently think: “We’re leaving this one. It’s not worth it.”
Follow NEWS.am STYLE on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram
23:01, October 19
It’s Not Just About Looks: Sexologist Explains Why Younger Men Are Attracted to Older Women21:33, October 19
White House in Crisis: Women Are Leaving Trump’s Team One After Another20:21, October 19
A $533 Million Yacht, a Château Controlled by iPhone and a $450 Million Painting: Inside the Lavish Life of Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince19:17, October 19
An Armenian Balm With an 800-Year History: How Matenadaran Brought an Ancient Recipe Back to Life16:23, October 19
Affair With a 19-Year-Old White House Intern and Infidelity Before His Wedding: New Book Reveals John F. Kennedy’s Secret Love Life15:15, October 19
Netflix Used Meghan Markle to Promote ‘The Gentlemen,’ Sources Claim14:38, October 19
She Can Afford a $13,000 Birkin but Refuses to Buy One: Social Media Star Explains Why She Won’t Splurge on Hermès’ Iconic Bag14:19, October 19
Secret Marriage, Abuse Allegations, a $100 Million Sex Tape and a $10 Million Wedding: Shocking Kim Kardashian Revelations in New Book13:18, October 19
Kim Kardashian Recreates Elizabeth Taylor’s Iconic Style in Vintage Balenciaga Gown and Dazzling Diamonds12:45, October 19
Bella Hadid Steals the Show at the 2026 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show in Two Stunning Looks and Giant Wings12:20, October 19
Luxury Under Guard: Dior Deploys Private Security Amid Paris Looting11:58, October 19
‘Best Sex of Her Life’: Dakota Johnson’s Friends Reveal Steamy Details of Her Romance With Machine Gun Kelly