NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

The 23rd "Golden Apricot" Yerevan International Film Festival has kicked off

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

Nikos Vertis to perform in Armenia for the 3rd time at the invitation of “ACVA BUILDINGS”

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

NEWS.am STYLE

The “filthy rich” phenomenon: Why people in wealthy countries are more likely to dislike billionaires

20:22, October 23

Can extreme wealth be a moral problem? This age-old question has resurfaced in the spotlight thanks to a new international study.

Researchers Jackson Trager and Mohammad Atari from the University of Southern California analyzed survey data from over 4,300 participants across 20 countries, publishing their findings in PNAS Nexus in the summer of 2025. Their results suggest that attitudes toward wealth depend not only on a country’s economic level but also on cultural norms and moral instincts, The Independent reports.

Different Countries, Different Morals

The study uncovered a clear pattern. In economically advanced and relatively egalitarian countries such as Switzerland, Belgium, and the Netherlands, people are more likely to view extreme wealth not only as unfair but also as morally questionable.

Conversely, in nations with higher inequality—such as Peru, Nigeria, or India—attitudes toward the wealthy are much more lenient. There, accumulating capital is seen more as the result of hard work and a means of survival than as an ethical concern.

The Moral Roots of Wealth

To understand these differences, the researchers drew on Moral Foundations Theory, which posits that our concepts of right and wrong are based on six core values: care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity (purity), and equality.

They found that individuals who place particular emphasis on equality and purity are more likely to perceive “excessive wealth” as morally wrong.

While the link between equality and perceptions of economic inequality is predictable, the role of “purity” was unexpected. Typically associated with physical or spiritual cleanliness, in this context, purity takes on a new meaning. The expression “filthy rich” becomes almost literal: extreme wealth is perceived as “tainted.”

Why It Matters

The study’s authors emphasize that attitudes toward money are not merely personal opinions—they are part of a cultural code. In highly unequal societies, people often morally justify existing economic systems, viewing them as natural and fair.

In contrast, in wealthier countries, there is heightened sensitivity to how extreme wealth can disrupt social balance. According to Oxfam, the world’s richest 1% own more wealth than the bottom 95% combined. However, attempts to reduce this gap through taxes or regulations may encounter resistance if the society at large does not view wealth as a moral issue.

An Interesting Insight

Subsequent research revealed that the idea of “excess” extends far beyond money. People who value moral “purity” tend to condemn other forms of excess as well: overambition, an overly active sex life, or even indulgence in pleasure. In this sense, the question is not only about inequality—anything perceived as “too much” can be seen as corrupting and dangerous.

Looking Ahead

The researchers plan to continue exploring how attitudes toward wealth evolve over time. For now, one thing is clear: perceptions of wealth mirror culture. In some countries, billionaires symbolize injustice; in others, they represent success and hope. But in every case, the question of how much money is “too much” remains a moral puzzle without a universal answer.


Follow NEWS.am STYLE on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram





  • Related News



@NEWSam_STYLE

  • Archive
Search