Despite microplastics being everywhere — in clothing, cleaning products, food, water, and air — new scientific assessments are challenging previous claims that these tiny particles accumulate inside the human body.
Several experts told The Guardian that some widely circulated studies on microplastics are “biologically implausible” and even “a joke.” Chemist Roger Culeman commented: “Many researchers make extraordinary claims but don’t provide even basic evidence.”
The first major study suggesting humans ingest microplastics dates back to 2018, when Austrian scientists analyzed stool samples from eight countries and reportedly found microplastics in every sample. Later studies claimed to detect particles in various organs and tissues — from the placenta and kidneys to the lungs and liver.
However, journalists found that at least seven widely cited studies have since been criticized. Some reviews showed that human tissue itself can produce signals mimicking plastic, resulting in false positives.
A study claiming to find microplastics in the human brain drew particular skepticism. German expert Dusan Materich called it “a joke”, explaining: “Fat is known to give false signals for polyethylene. The brain is 60% fat.”
Other researchers question the reported amounts of microplastics in the body. Environmental chemist Cassandra Raurt noted: “Given typical daily exposure, it’s biologically improbable for such quantities of plastic to end up in organs.”
Fazel Monik, a nanomaterials specialist at the University of Padua, added that even if a particle reaches a protected organ, it wouldn’t appear as depicted in most published studies.
While the criticism points to methodological flaws and potential exaggeration, scientists stress that the risks shouldn’t be completely ignored. Microplastics can carry toxic chemicals that may trigger inflammation, cell damage, hormone disruption, gut microbiome imbalance, reduced fertility, and increased chronic disease risk.
Experts recommend simple precautions, like avoiding drinking from plastic bottles and heating food in plastic containers, the main dietary sources of microplastics.
Raurt emphasized: “We need accurate data to inform public health authorities, governments, and the public, and to develop proper regulations and policies.”
Materich concluded: “Microplastics in our bodies? Probably. But it’s wise to take precautions to minimize the risks — that’s what I do myself.”
Follow NEWS.am STYLE on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram
18:18, November 7
Richard Branson and Ray Dalio Have No Tolerance for Office Gossip: Why Some Billionaires Are Willing to Fire Employees Over It17:33, November 7
Robert Pattinson and Nicholas Hoult Join the Race to Become the Next James Bond16:37, November 7
Lavish Birthday at Taxpayers’ Expense: Ivanka Trump’s Security in Morocco Cost $93,00015:29, November 7
Jessica Simpson’s Sexual Renaissance: 46-Year-Old Star Is Head Over Heels for Younger Boyfriend14:23, November 7
Oat and Almond Milk Could Put Your Health at Risk, Scientists Warn13:23, November 7
Threw a Plate of Spaghetti in Her Face: Bride Explodes After Bridesmaid Refuses to Gain 120 Pounds12:21, November 7
Bridgerton Star Sabrina Bartlett Marries Businessman Lachie Stewart in Romantic Tuscan Wedding11:18, November 7
Khloe Kardashian’s Ex-Husband Makes More Than $50,000 on OnlyFans in Just Eight Days10:30, November 7
Meghan Markle’s Father Led Away in Handcuffs From Nursing Home: He Faces Up to 20 Years in Prison in Child Sexual Abuse Material Case23:01, November 6
Kering’s Creative Shake-Up: Pierpaolo Piccioli Exits Balenciaga After Two Other Designers Leave22:33, November 6
Mother-in-Law vs Daughter-in-Law: Nicola Peltz Appears to Be Copying Victoria Beckham’s Most Iconic Looks21:22, November 6
“Crossed the Line”: Billionaire Brunello Cucinelli Accused of Inappropriate Touching During Photo Shoots with Actresses