Despite microplastics being everywhere — in clothing, cleaning products, food, water, and air — new scientific assessments are challenging previous claims that these tiny particles accumulate inside the human body.
Several experts told The Guardian that some widely circulated studies on microplastics are “biologically implausible” and even “a joke.” Chemist Roger Culeman commented: “Many researchers make extraordinary claims but don’t provide even basic evidence.”
The first major study suggesting humans ingest microplastics dates back to 2018, when Austrian scientists analyzed stool samples from eight countries and reportedly found microplastics in every sample. Later studies claimed to detect particles in various organs and tissues — from the placenta and kidneys to the lungs and liver.
However, journalists found that at least seven widely cited studies have since been criticized. Some reviews showed that human tissue itself can produce signals mimicking plastic, resulting in false positives.
A study claiming to find microplastics in the human brain drew particular skepticism. German expert Dusan Materich called it “a joke”, explaining: “Fat is known to give false signals for polyethylene. The brain is 60% fat.”
Other researchers question the reported amounts of microplastics in the body. Environmental chemist Cassandra Raurt noted: “Given typical daily exposure, it’s biologically improbable for such quantities of plastic to end up in organs.”
Fazel Monik, a nanomaterials specialist at the University of Padua, added that even if a particle reaches a protected organ, it wouldn’t appear as depicted in most published studies.
While the criticism points to methodological flaws and potential exaggeration, scientists stress that the risks shouldn’t be completely ignored. Microplastics can carry toxic chemicals that may trigger inflammation, cell damage, hormone disruption, gut microbiome imbalance, reduced fertility, and increased chronic disease risk.
Experts recommend simple precautions, like avoiding drinking from plastic bottles and heating food in plastic containers, the main dietary sources of microplastics.
Raurt emphasized: “We need accurate data to inform public health authorities, governments, and the public, and to develop proper regulations and policies.”
Materich concluded: “Microplastics in our bodies? Probably. But it’s wise to take precautions to minimize the risks — that’s what I do myself.”
Follow NEWS.am STYLE on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram
19:19, September 16
Louis Vuitton Could Become More Affordable: Analyst Suggests Lowering Handbag Prices16:42, September 16
Le Labo Unveils Its 2026 Holiday Collection: Iconic Scents in Miniature16:19, September 16
Audemars Piguet Unveils Serena Williams Watch: Just 500 Pieces in White Ceramic15:44, September 16
Cashmere Coats and Bags Worth Thousands: Louis Vuitton Unveils a Travel Wardrobe for the Rich15:20, September 16
Rolex for $72,800: Platinum, a Moon Phase and a Calendar That Counts the Months Itself14:38, September 16
Princess Diana’s Brother’s Sensational Memoir Stolen From Truck Days Before Publication14:14, September 16
72-Year-Old Christie Brinkley Steals the Spotlight From Younger Models: ‘I Feel Like a Million Dollars Plus Tax’13:56, September 16
64-Year-Old Tom Cruise Strips Down for GQ and Makes a Surprising Confession About His ‘Crazy’ Personality13:18, September 16
‘Pinned Her to the Floor and Covered Her Mouth’: American Fashion Chief Sparks Scandal at Show With PETA Activist12:35, September 16
Shailene Woodley Stuns at the Emmys: Her Bizarre Balenciaga Look Sparks a Wave of Mockery12:16, September 16
Robert De Niro Breaks Down in Tears Live on Air11:48, September 16
Emmys Scandal: Chuck Norris Left Out of In Memoriam Tribute After His Death — Co-Star Furious